Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
Update:
- A class action lawsuit alleging Canada Goose misled consumers by claiming its fur was ethically sourced has been dismissed.
- In a joint filing in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Apr. 27, counsels for plaintiff George Lee and Canada Goose alerted the court that they’d voluntarily dismissed the case, The Fashion Law reports.
- In his lawsuit, Lee alleged Canada Goose violated federal warranty laws and state consumer laws by claiming in its marketing that it’s committed to “ethical, responsible and sustainable sourcing” when in fact its suppliers use leg traps and neck snares that “cause strangulation and broken bones to coyotes and other animals who are inadvertently trapped and discarded.”
- The case was dismissed with prejudice and Canada Goose made no payment to settle the case.
(July 7, 2022)
A Canadian clothing company known for making winter coats with coyote fur can’t escape a class action lawsuit alleging that it misled consumers by claiming its fur was ethically sourced, a New York federal judge has ruled.
In an order Tuesday, June 29, U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero said Plaintiff George Lee’s class action lawsuit against Canada Goose could go ahead, despite the company’s attempts to have it dismissed as “subjective views,” Law360 reported.
In his lawsuit, Lee alleges Canada Goose violated federal warranty laws and state consumer laws by claiming in its marketing that it’s committed to “ethical, responsible and sustainable sourcing,” when in fact its suppliers use leg traps and neck snares that “cause strangulation and broken bones to coyotes and other animals who are inadvertently trapped and discarded.”
He claims that fur trim included in Canada Goose products comes from trappers in places where there are no laws and regulations regarding the slaughter of trapped animals.
However, the company says that its fur suppliers are strictly regulated and its fur comes from ethical and sustainable sources. Lee alleges Canada Goose made the misleading claims to make its products appeal to eco-friendly consumers.
In his complaint, filed in 2020, he alleges Canada Goose “attempts to cultivate an image that its fur products are sourced using humane, sustainable, and ethical practices, when in fact they are not.”
On Tuesday, Judge Marreo said in his order that Lee had made a plausible argument, saying that his allegations support a “reasonable inference” that Canada Goose gets its fur from trappers whose methods are inhumane, despite making an outwards commitment to ethical fur sourcing.
“Plaintiff alleges that reasonable consumers consider ‘animal welfare’ to be an important factor in whether a product is ‘ethically produced,’ and that consumer-perception research indicates that terms such as ‘sustainably produced’ are perceived as signaling compliance with ‘higher animal welfare standards,'” he said.
“These allegations are enough to establish at the pleading stage” that unsophisticated customers might be persuaded to act on the basis of the company’s statements.”
Lee also said Canada Goose products come with a tag saying its supply chain visibility ensured its fur was sourced in accordance with international trapping standards. However, he said the trapping methods its suppliers use have been banned as inhumane in several states across the United States.
This is not the first time Canada Goose has been accused of making false claims about ethical sourcing.
In 2019, PETA filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission. Graphic film footage taken at one of Canada Goose’s down suppliers showed geese being grabbed and carried by their necks and piled on top of one another in pens, being deprived of food and water and forced to watch as other geese were being slaughtered.
Have you purchased a Canada Goose product with fur? What do you think of the class action allegations? Tell us in the comment section below!
George Lee is represented by Jay Russell Shooster and Kim E. Richman of Richman Law Group, and Samuel J. Strauss of Truke & Strauss LLP.
The Canada Goose Misleading Claims Class Action Lawsuit is Lee et al. v. Canada Goose Inc., Case No. 1:20-cv-09809, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
13 thoughts onCanada Goose Class Action Over ‘Ethical’ Fur Sourcing Settled Out of Court
True, the least harmful methods of obtaining goose down and coyote fur should be used; however, people bothered by animal products and clothing should patronize another brand. Man has been using animal products for clothing and warmth since the dawn of time… if it bothers people, let them take their business elsewhere and leave the rest of us alone.
I hope that the class actions move along more swiftly then before. Someone let us know how to join the class action of canada goose soon please.
This suit was dismissed after the judge ruled trapping and killing the animals from the wild are a far more humane method of harvesting than if they were farmed in a warehouse without free range. Sorry to burst your bubble but in order to use the fur of an animal you must strip its skin off and no animal should be alive when that happens.